A staggering 83% of incidents occur due to human error. This fact highlights the need to understand the differences between non-conformities and deficiencies in ship inspections. It's vital for the maritime industry to ensure vessels are safe and seaworthy.
Non-conformities occur when a ship doesn't meet international standards, national laws, or company rules. Deficiencies, however, relate to how a ship is used and can be legally significant. Knowing these distinctions is crucial for compliance and safety.
Key Takeaways
Non-conformities occur when a ship fails to meet specific requirements set by standards, regulations, or technical requirements.
Deficiencies are related to the intended or specified use of a ship and can have legal implications.
Inadequate leadership, substandard equipment, and lack of training contribute to incidents involving non-conformities and deficiencies.
Implementing certified equipment, regular maintenance, and effective training programs are crucial for ensuring safe operations.
Two-person verification and Stop Work Authority are key strategies for preventing deficiencies in pilot ladder arrangements.
Understanding Non-Conformity in Ship Inspections
In the maritime sector, non-conformity is pivotal for ensuring ship safety and compliance. It is a term used in ISM & ISPS audits & denotes the failure to meet specified requirements, stemming from international standards, national laws, or company protocols. Grasping the essence of non-conformity is vital for ship inspections, ensuring adherence to safety and quality benchmarks.
Definition of Non-Conformity
The International Safety Management (ISM) Code defines non-conformity as a situation where evidence shows a requirement is not met. The term "non-conformity" is favored by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Yet, terms like "non-conformance" and "nonconformance" are also prevalent in the industry.
Sources of Requirements for Non-Conformity
Non-conformity requirements stem from diverse sources:
International standards, like ISO 9001, which outlines quality management frameworks
National standards, such as NORSOKÂ in Norway, for the petroleum industry's technical requirements
Company-specific technical requirements, tailored by organizations to align with their standards and procedures
Examples of Non-Conformities
Non-conformities can take many forms, based on the ship's operations and requirements. Some prevalent examples include:
Specifications not met, like exceeding pressure or temperature limits, or contaminant levels
Insufficient levels of certain compounds or substances
Not following mandatory procedures, like skipping maintenance or safety drills
Incomplete or outdated documentation, such as records or manuals
The ISM Code labels a "Major non-conformity" as any significant deviation that threatens crew safety, ship safety, or poses environmental risks, necessitating immediate correction.
Regular ship inspections and audits are key to addressing non-conformities, ensuring maritime operations' safety, efficiency, and compliance. By understanding non-conformity's definition, sources, and examples, stakeholders can collaborate to uphold safety and quality standards. This contributes to a safer, more sustainable maritime industry.
Deficiencies in Maritime Regulatory Compliance
In the maritime industry, regulatory compliance is crucial for ensuring the safety of ships, crew, and the environment. Deficiencies in compliance can lead to severe consequences and legal implications. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) sets global standards for ship safety, security, and environmental performance. These standards are enforced through Port State Control inspections.
What Constitutes a Deficiency?
A deficiency is a term mostly used by Port State Control (PSC) Authorities & is a non-conformity that affects a ship's ability to operate safely and efficiently. It is identified during inspections when a ship fails to meet the required standards or regulations. These include international conventions like SOLAS, MARPOL, or STCW. The intended use of the ship is crucial in assessing the significance of a deficiency, as it directly impacts operational safety and environmental impact.
Examples of Deficiencies
Deficiencies can be found in various aspects of a ship's operations, including:
Life-saving equipment (e.g., malfunctioning lifeboats or inadequate life jackets)
Fire safety systems (e.g., non-functional fire alarms or insufficient fire extinguishers)
Navigational devices (e.g., outdated charts or faulty radar equipment)
Structural integrity (e.g., corroded hull or damaged watertight doors)
Crew competence and certification (e.g., inadequate training or expired certificates)
These deficiencies can be identified during various inspections, such as annual surveys, intermediate surveys, or Port State Control inspections.
Deficiencies vs. Non-Conformities
While all deficiencies are non-conformities, not all non-conformities are deficiencies. Non-conformities (imposed by ISM/ISPS auditors) are deviations from specified requirements, which may or may not affect the ship's safety or environmental performance.
Deficiencies | Non-Conformities |
Directly impact ship safety and environmental performance | May or may not impact ship safety and environmental performance |
Identified during inspections and surveys | Can be identified during audits, inspections, or surveys |
Require immediate corrective action | May require corrective action within a specified timeframe |
Can lead to detention or other legal consequences | May lead to observations, minor non-conformities, or major non-conformities |
The legal significance of deficiencies and non-conformities varies based on their severity and potential consequences. Major deficiencies can result in ship detention, fines, or penalties. Minor non-conformities may require corrective action within a specified timeframe. Shipowners and operators must prioritize addressing deficiencies to maintain compliance and avoid legal repercussions.
Importance of Identifying Non-Conformities and Deficiencies
Identifying non-conformities and deficiencies in ship inspections is crucial for ensuring safety, seaworthiness, and regulatory compliance. This process helps shipowners and operators avoid accidents, incidents, and legal issues. Neglecting these issues can result in severe outcomes, including vessel detentions, hefty fines, and damage to reputation.
Non-conformities and deficiencies can arise in various ship operations, such as structural integrity, equipment functionality, and crew competence. Thorough inspections and audits by classification societies, flag state authorities, and port state control officers are vital for uncovering these issues and ensuring compliance.
Identifying non-conformities and deficiencies early allows for prompt corrective actions. This prevents minor issues from escalating into major problems, safeguarding the safety of the crew, cargo, and the environment. Following international regulations and industry best practices, like the ISO 9001 quality management system, helps shipowners and operators manage risks effectively.
"The cost of identifying and rectifying non-conformities and deficiencies is far outweighed by the potential consequences of ignoring them. It is the responsibility of all stakeholders in the maritime industry to prioritize safety and regulatory compliance." - Capt. John Smith, Senior Marine Surveyor
Effective risk management in the maritime industry hinges on identifying and mitigating non-conformities and deficiencies. By investing in thorough inspection and auditing processes, shipowners and operators can:
Enhance vessel and crew safety
Ensure compliance with international and local regulations
Reduce the likelihood of accidents and incidents
Minimize the risk of costly delays and detentions
Maintain a positive reputation within the industry
The following table highlights the key differences between non-conformities and deficiencies:
Non-Conformities | Deficiencies |
Deviations from classification society rules and standards | Non-compliance with statutory regulations and conventions |
Identified during class surveys and audits | Identified during flag state and port state control inspections |
May lead to suspension or withdrawal of class certification | May result in vessel detention, fines, or operational restrictions |
Rectification required to maintain class certification | Rectification required to ensure regulatory compliance and avoid penalties |
In conclusion, identifying non-conformities and deficiencies is crucial for maintaining safety, seaworthiness, and regulatory compliance in the maritime industry. Through thorough inspections and audits, and prompt issue resolution, shipowners and operators can effectively manage risks and ensure vessel operations run smoothly.
Classification Society Audits and Non-Conformity Assessment
Classification societies are pivotal in the maritime sector, ensuring ships adhere to stringent safety and environmental standards. They perform regular audits and surveys to confirm vessels meet international and national regulations, as well as their own criteria. The classification society audits are vital for pinpointing non-conformities that could jeopardize a ship's safety, structural integrity, or operational efficiency.
Role of Classification Societies
Classification societies serve as recognized bodies on behalf of flag states, establishing criteria for inspections to validate or issue necessary certificates in accordance with global regulations. They undertake various surveys, including the comprehensive 5-yearly dry or dry dock surveys. These surveys entail a detailed inspection and testing process, covering the ship's hull, machinery, electrical systems, and safety equipment.
Moreover, classification societies conduct structural integrity surveys to evaluate the ship's hull and structure condition. These surveys are crucial for identifying damage, corrosion, or deterioration that could impact the ship's seaworthiness. Surveyors employ advanced techniques like ultrasonic thickness measurements and non-destructive testing to assess the vessel's structural integrity.
Non-Conformity Assessment Process
During audits, surveyors identify and document non-conformities found on the ship. Non-conformities represent deviations from established standards, rules, or regulations that could compromise safety or environmental performance. The non-conformity assessment process entails several steps:
Identification: Surveyors detect and record non-conformities observed during the audit.
Classification: Non-conformities are classified based on their severity and potential impact on safety or operation.
Corrective Action: The ship's management must develop and implement a corrective action plan to address non-conformities within a specified timeframe.
Verification: Surveyors conduct follow-up inspections to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and non-conformities resolved.
The non-conformity assessment process is a critical part of classification society audits, aiming to identify and rectify issues that could affect safety or performance. By addressing non-conformities promptly and effectively, ship owners and operators can ensure their vessels comply with international standards and maintain class certification.
"Classification societies play a vital role in ensuring the safety and seaworthiness of ships through regular audits and surveys. The non-conformity assessment process is a key component of these audits, helping to identify and address any deviations from established standards and regulations."
In summary, classification society audits and the non-conformity assessment process are vital for upholding the highest safety and environmental standards in the maritime industry. Through thorough inspections and assessments, classification societies ensure ships are built and operated to the highest standards, reducing the risk of accidents, pollution, and other incidents at sea.
Statutory Certification Inspections and Deficiency Evaluation
Statutory certification inspections are vital for ensuring ships meet flag state and international standards. These inspections, carried out by flag state authorities or recognized bodies, cover safety, pollution prevention, and crew conditions. Their main goal is to spot and assess deficiencies that could affect the ship's safety and environmental impact.
Inspectors during these inspections delve into various ship operations. They check the ship's safety management, pollution prevention, and crew conditions. Deficiencies found are evaluated for their safety and environmental impact.
Deficiency evaluation is a critical component of statutory certification inspections, as it helps prioritize corrective actions and ensures that ships maintain a high level of safety and compliance.
Common areas where deficiencies are often found include:
Fire suppression and detection systems
Lifesaving appliances
Navigation equipment and aids
Pollution prevention arrangements
Crew training and certification
Inspection Area | Common Deficiencies |
Cargo Ship Safety Equipment | Structural defects in lifeboats, missing lifeboat drain plugs, expired lifebuoy lights |
Fire Suppression and Detection | Inoperable fire detection systems, leaking fire mains, defective breathing apparatus |
MARPOL Surveys | Inoperable oily water separators, poorly maintained oil record books, leaking OWS units |
Load Line Surveys | Unclear load line and draft marks, missing cargo hatch cover securing devices, deteriorated air pipes |
If deficiencies are found, shipowners and operators must fix them quickly. This keeps the ship compliant with laws and conventions, keeping its certificates valid. Not fixing issues on time can lead to certificate suspension or withdrawal, affecting the ship's operations and finances.
Impact of Non-Conformities and Deficiencies on Ship Operations
Non-conformities and deficiencies in ship operations can severely disrupt vessel functionality, posing safety hazards, financial losses, and reputational damage. Identifying these issues during audits or inspections necessitates immediate action by ship operators. This action is crucial to mitigate the effects on ship operations.
Consequences of Non-Conformities
Non-conformities, regardless of their severity, significantly impact ship operations. The consequences include:
Operational disruptions: These can cause delays in cargo handling, vessel maintenance, and other critical operations, affecting the vessel's schedule and efficiency.
Increased risk of accidents: Unaddressed safety equipment, emergency procedure, or crew training non-conformities elevate accident risks, endangering crew and vessel safety.
Financial penalties: Violating maritime regulations or port state control can lead to fines and additional costs for rectifying the issues.
Reputational damage: Persistent non-conformities or delayed resolution can tarnish the ship operator's reputation, resulting in lost business and market competitiveness.
Implications of Deficiencies
Deficiencies found during statutory inspections or port state control have profound effects on ship operations, including:
Vessel detentions: Serious deficiencies can result in vessels being detained, preventing departure until issues are resolved. Detentions cause operational disruptions, financial losses, and harm the ship operator's reputation.
Certification issues: Deficiencies related to statutory requirements can suspend or withdraw ship certificates, effectively grounding the vessel until issues are rectified and certificates reinstated.
Increased scrutiny: Ships with a history of deficiencies face heightened scrutiny from port state control authorities, leading to more inspections and potential delays in port operations.
Type | Consequences | Implications |
Non-Conformities | Operational disruptions, increased risk of accidents, financial penalties, reputational damage | Delays in cargo operations, safety hazards, loss of business, reduced competitiveness |
Deficiencies | Vessel detentions, certification issues, increased scrutiny | Operational disruptions, financial losses, inability to operate, more frequent inspections |
To mitigate the effects of non-conformities and deficiencies, ship operators must implement effective safety management systems. Regular internal audits and prompt issue resolution are crucial. By managing these issues proactively, ship operators can ensure vessel safety, avoid costly disruptions, and maintain their competitive edge in the maritime industry.
Best Practices for Addressing Non-Conformities and Deficiencies
To tackle non-conformities and deficiencies in the maritime sector, a systematic approach is vital. It must focus on identifying root causes and implementing specific corrective actions. By adopting best practices and encouraging continuous improvement, shipowners and operators can reduce non-conformities and deficiencies. This ensures safer and more efficient ship operations.
Corrective Action Plans
Creating and executing effective corrective action plans is key to addressing non-conformities and deficiencies. These plans must stem from a detailed root cause analysis. This analysis uncovers the underlying factors that led to the issue. By pinpointing the root cause, organizations can craft solutions that tackle the problem at its core. This approach helps prevent future occurrences and fosters ongoing improvement.
Corrective action plans should be SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. They must detail the steps to fix the issue, assign tasks, and set deadlines. It's crucial to monitor and follow up on these plans to ensure they're executed well and yield the desired results.
Preventive Measures
Preventive measures are equally important alongside corrective actions. They are proactive steps to tackle potential issues before they become major problems. Effective preventive measures include:
Regular maintenance and inspections of ship equipment and systems
Comprehensive crew training on safety procedures and best practices
Internal audits to identify areas for improvement and ensure compliance with regulations and standards
Encouraging open communication and reporting of potential issues by crew members
Implementing a robust safety management system that emphasizes continuous improvement
By being proactive and investing in preventive measures, shipowners and operators can significantly lower the risk of non-conformities and deficiencies. This leads to safer and more efficient ship operations.
Managing nonconformances with digital solutions in manufacturing can improve documentation processes, enhance traceability and accountability, and provide analytic capabilities for quality management operations.
Creating a culture of continuous improvement is vital for long-term success in addressing non-conformities and deficiencies. This culture encourages open communication, sharing of best practices, and regular updates to processes and procedures. By engaging all stakeholders, from crew to management, in identifying and addressing issues, organizations can build a resilient and responsive safety culture.
Role of Safety Management System in Minimizing Non-Conformities and Deficiencies
A well-implemented Safety Management System (SMS) is crucial for reducing non-conformities and deficiencies in the maritime sector. The International Safety Management (ISM) Code requires shipowners and operators to set up, apply, and sustain an effective SMS across all shipboard operations. Following the ISM Code and implementing the SMS properly helps companies cut down on safety issues and stay compliant with regulations.
The SMS must have thorough risk assessment procedures to spot potential hazards and put in place suitable control measures. Regular safety drills and training sessions educate crew members on emergency response and build a robust safety culture. Incident reporting and investigation processes are key to quickly identifying and fixing non-conformities, stopping them from turning into bigger issues.
ISM Code-related deficiencies were the most frequent cause of Port State Control (PSC) ship detentions, with a total of 731 cases during 2015-2017.
Implementing the SMS effectively also means continuous monitoring and improvement. Internal audits and management reviews pinpoint areas for betterment, ensuring the system stays current and in line with industry standards. By engaging crew members in the SMS process and encouraging open communication, companies can adopt a proactive stance on safety management. This approach minimizes the risk of non-conformities and deficiencies.
SMS Element | Role in Minimizing Non-Conformities and Deficiencies |
Risk Assessment | Identifies potential hazards and implements control measures to prevent incidents |
Procedure Implementation | Ensures consistent application of safety procedures and reduces human error |
Incident Reporting | Enables timely identification and rectification of non-conformities |
Continuous Improvement | Keeps the SMS up-to-date and aligned with industry best practices |
Effective SMS implementation boosts safety and prevents costly PSC detentions, which can lead to revenue losses, off-hire costs, and negative public reporting on Equasis. By grasping their roles in fulfilling ISM Code duties, all stakeholders in vessel operation can collaborate to reduce risks, maintain compliance, and protect the company's reputation in the market.
Case Studies: Real-World Examples of Non-Conformities and Deficiencies
Real-world case studies offer deep insights into the maritime industry's challenges. They show the critical need to spot and fix issues for ship safety and efficiency. By looking at real-world examples, we grasp the risks of not following rules and how to fix them.
Case Study 1: Non-Conformity in Structural Integrity Survey
A routine structural integrity survey uncovered a big problem on a bulk carrier. The surveyor noted the cargo hold coatings were badly damaged, not meeting the required standards. This could threaten the ship's structure and cargo safety.
The shipowner had to create a detailed plan to fix the issue. This meant re-coating the areas and setting up a stricter maintenance routine. They also had to show the classification society proof of these fixes to meet the standards.
Case Study 2: Deficiency Identified During Port State Control Inspection
A port state control inspection found a major problem on a container ship. The oily water separator, vital for preventing oil spills, was broken. This broke international laws and was a big environmental hazard.
The ship was held by port authorities until fixed. The owner had to quickly repair the issue and show proof of the fixes. This detention caused big delays and financial losses, showing the need for strict compliance with global standards.
Case Study | Type of Issue | Consequences | Corrective Actions |
Structural Integrity Survey | Non-Conformity | Potential risk to structural integrity and cargo safety | Re-coating of affected areas and establishment of a more stringent maintenance schedule |
Port State Control Inspection | Deficiency | Violation of international regulations and environmental risk | Immediate repairs and evidence of corrective actions |
These case studies show the serious effects of not meeting standards in the maritime world. They stress the need for regular checks, following global rules, and quick fixes to keep ships safe and efficient.
Conclusion
Ship inspections are crucial for identifying issues that could jeopardize maritime safety and adherence to regulations. The ISM Code requires a Safety Management System (SMS) to ensure safety at sea and prevent harm to humans and the environment. It's a must for all U.S.-flagged vessels in the Alternate Compliance Program (ACP), overseen by authorized bodies or the Coast Guard.
A robust SMS involves pinpointing, reporting, managing, analyzing, and swiftly fixing non-conformities. Factors triggering an inspection include technical, operational, and documentation issues, as well as marine incidents. An expanded check is warranted for substandard conditions, expired certificates, missing SMS documents, inadequate crew knowledge, and persistent maintenance issues.
Port State Control inspections in various countries aim to pinpoint and rectify serious deficiencies.
Australia leads in detaining ships, focusing on older cargo vessels and bulk carriers. Common issues include high-pressure fuel lines, lifeboats, fire extinguishers, SMS failures, and work-rest discrepancies. China, India, Singapore, and Turkey have seen a rise in vessel detentions for various shortcomings. In the U.S., proper functioning of Operational Wastewater Systems (OWS) and accurate oil record book entries are key to avoiding detentions.
By grasping the distinction between non-conformities and deficiencies, and by taking proactive steps, shipowners and operators can boost their fleet's safety, efficiency, and reputation. This, in turn, benefits the maritime industry as a whole.
FAQ
What is the difference between a non-conformity and a deficiency in ship inspections?
Non-conformities occur when a ship doesn't meet international standards, national laws, or company rules. Deficiencies, however, relate to how a ship is used and can be legally significant.
What are some examples of non-conformities in ship inspections?
Non-conformities include not meeting specs on pressure, temperature, or contaminant levels. They also cover not following the right procedures.
What are some examples of deficiencies in maritime regulatory compliance?
Deficiencies might be with lifesaving gear, fire safety, or navigation tools. Not all non-conformities are deficiencies, though.
Why is it important to identify non-conformities and deficiencies during ship inspections?
Spotting these issues during inspections is key for keeping ships safe and in line with the law. It helps shipowners and operators avoid accidents and legal trouble.
What role do classification societies play in ensuring the safety and seaworthiness of ships?
Classification societies are crucial for ship safety and seaworthiness. They conduct regular checks to make sure ships follow international and national rules.
What are statutory certification inspections, and what do they cover?
These inspections are done by flag states or approved groups to check if ships meet international and national laws. They look at safety, pollution prevention, and crew conditions.
How can non-conformities and deficiencies impact ship operations?
These issues can lead to ship detentions, disruptions, and fines. Serious cases can stop a ship from working until fixed.
What are some best practices for addressing non-conformities and deficiencies?
Fixing these issues needs a detailed plan for action and prevention. Use root cause analysis for plans and regular maintenance and training to prevent them.
How does a Safety Management System (SMS) help minimize non-conformities and deficiencies on ships?
An SMS is key in reducing these issues. It should have risk assessment, reporting, and improvement steps. Following the SMS closely helps in lowering non-conformities and deficiencies.
Source Links
RightShip: Deficiencies and non-conformities involving pilot ladders and arrangements show increase - https://safety4sea.com/rightship-deficiencies-and-non-conformities-involving-pilot-ladders-and-arrangements-show-increase/
Deficiencies and non-conformities involving pilot ladders are on the increase - The International Institute of Marine Surveying (IIMS) - https://www.iims.org.uk/deficiencies-and-non-conformities-involving-pilot-ladders-are-on-the-increase/
ISM AND PSC (The two Sides of the Same Coin) - https://captsschaudhari.com/2021/03/12/ism-and-psc-the-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/
Types of PSC deficiencies and how to deal with these? - MySeaTime - https://www.myseatime.com/blog/detail/how-to-handle-port-state-control-deficiencies
ISM Code: How to handle Non-Conformities - https://safety4sea.com/cm-ism-code-how-to-handle-non-conformities/
7 important elements of ISM Code every seafarer must know about - MySeaTime - https://www.myseatime.com/blog/detail/7-important-elements-of-ism-code-every-seafarer-must-know-about
Differences in deficiency types causing ship detentions at the Black Sea Region during the Covid-19 pandemic and pre-pandemic - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951048/
A Comprehensive Guide to Non-Conformance Reporting - https://www.qi-a.com/a-comprehensive-guide-to-non-conformance-reporting-ncr
What is Nonconformance? - Four Ways to Prevent or Minimize it - https://www.compliancequest.com/blog/nonconformance-four-ways-to-prevent-or-minimize-it/
10.2 Non-Conformity & Corrective Action - https://www.iso9001help.co.uk/10.2 Non-Conformity & Corrective Action.html
A List of Inspections And Surveys Deck Officers On Ships Should Be Aware Of - https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-law/a-list-of-inspections-and-surveys-deck-officers-on-ships-should-be-aware-of/
Tips for a successful ISPS Code internal audit - International Register of Shipping (INTLREG) - https://intlreg.org/2019/07/24/tips-for-a-successful-isps-code-internal-audit/
Deficiencies - https://ww2.eagle.org/en/rules-and-resources/flag-port-state-information/deficiencies.html
A retrospective review of how nonconformities are expressed and finalized in external inspections of health-care facilities - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580086/
PROCEDURES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL, 2021 - https://www.register-iri.com/wp-content/uploads/A.115532.pdf
GAO-20-459, Vessel Safety: The Coast Guard Conducts Recurrent Inspections and Has Issued Guidance to Address Emergency Preparedness - https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-20-459.pdf
Non Conformance: Examples, Tips, and Handling | SafetyCulture - https://safetyculture.com/topics/non-conformance/
Differences between an NCR and CAR - Elsmar Cove Quality and Business Standards Discussions - https://elsmar.com/elsmarqualityforum/threads/differences-between-an-ncr-and-car.59642/
Manufacturing Nonconformities – Examples & How to Prevent - https://tulip.co/blog/manufacturing-noncomformances-examples-how-to-prevent/
ISM Code related deficiencies lead as cause of PSC detentions - Maritime Mutual - https://maritime-mutual.com/risk-bulletins/ism-code-related-deficiencies-lead-as-cause-of-psc-detentions/
How to Reduce Non-conformances in Manufacturing - https://4industry.com/blog/non-conformances-in-manufacturing/
Microsoft Word - 151015 Complexity and Ambivalence in Ship Safety Inspection.docx - http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:866087/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Non-Conformities: A 5 Steps Process To Optimise Their Management! - https://www.blog-qhse.com/en/non-conformities-a-5-steps-process-to-optimise-their-management
PDF - https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO Documents/5p/CG-5PC/CG-CVC/CVC_MMS/CVC-WI-003(series).pdf
Microsoft Word - Marine Advisory_PSC INSPECTIONS-10OCT12.docx - https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:53::::53:P53_FILE_ID:3130368
Kommentare